Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
Post Reply
bdub
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Harrison Hot Springs, BC, Canada

Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by bdub »

Hey guys, I'm just wondering whether you think the Elite.5 is a worthwhile upgrade over the TI1600.5?
The reason why I'm asking is because the 5-channel Elite doesn't have the bigger Sanken output transistors of its siblings - I think they're the same as those in the TI1600.5. The Elite of course does have the BB op amps, the nice caps, and a more powerful sub section (among other things), but are those things enough to offset the cost difference?
Thanks for any advice.
180 Amp alternator
Stinger Spp1200 battery
PG TDD5
Ipod Mini/Pure I-20 (optical to Bit1)
Fiio X5 (dig coax to Bit1)
Audison Bitone.1
Tru Tech Line-8isx
PG Elite.4 (tweets/mids)
PG Elite.2 (midbass)
PG TI21300.1 (subs)
PG Bass Cube
PG TI9 midbass
ScanSpeak 10F/4425G00 midrange
ScanSpeak Illuminator R3004/602000 tweets
Acoustic Elegance SBP15 subs
Kirghiz
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:59 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by Kirghiz »

bdub wrote:are those things enough to offset the cost difference?
Yes, yes they are. The Elite.5 is arguably the best "total system amp" ever made in terms of sound quality and power, and while the Ti1600.5 is a capable amp, it's just not the Elite.5. Not even close.

That being said, the Elite.5 is a gigantic amp, roughly three times the size of the Ti, so if space is an issue for you, I would avoid the Elites entirely.
Being loud without good sound quality is pointless, but having good sound quality without being loud is also pointless.
bdub
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Harrison Hot Springs, BC, Canada

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by bdub »

You're thinking of the TI2. I'm talking about the 2010/2011 TI line. The 5-channel is actually bigger in dimensions than the Elite.
That being said, I appreciate your feedback and tend to agree with you. Just trying to convince myself a bit more to spend money lol.
180 Amp alternator
Stinger Spp1200 battery
PG TDD5
Ipod Mini/Pure I-20 (optical to Bit1)
Fiio X5 (dig coax to Bit1)
Audison Bitone.1
Tru Tech Line-8isx
PG Elite.4 (tweets/mids)
PG Elite.2 (midbass)
PG TI21300.1 (subs)
PG Bass Cube
PG TI9 midbass
ScanSpeak 10F/4425G00 midrange
ScanSpeak Illuminator R3004/602000 tweets
Acoustic Elegance SBP15 subs
User avatar
dwnrodeo
Posts: 1932
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:35 am
Location: MI

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dwnrodeo »

In my opinion... no. Now this is purely subjective as I've never heard either amplifier nor do I know the differences in parts, but in my experience, at similar power ratings, most PG amps sound similar. I've A/B'd M several different series PG amplifiers and I can't tell a noticeable difference other than when the power of one amplifier is triple that of the other, then the noise floor seems much lower. That being said, I also don't have golden ears, but I am willing to bet in a car audio environment you won't be able to tell the difference just by listening either.
XS2300, XS2500, XS2300, X200.4, X100.2, Ti21000.4, Roadster 66

I'm gonna become a civil engineer. I'm gonna design septic tanks for playgrounds. Little kids can take shits! You idiot, what the hell do you do?
Kirghiz
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:59 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by Kirghiz »

bdub wrote:You're thinking of the TI2. I'm talking about the 2010/2011 TI line. The 5-channel is actually bigger in dimensions than the Elite.
That being said, I appreciate your feedback and tend to agree with you. Just trying to convince myself a bit more to spend money lol.
Oh, that's an even bigger difference then. That Ti line had the power ratings determined by dynamic power, and not rms power, so the Elite.5 actually makes more power. Iirc the Elite.5 I had was rated at 140 watts x 4 rms @ 4 ohm and over 750 watts rms @ 2 ohm and 1180some watts rms @ 1 ohm on the sub channel according to the birth sheet.
Being loud without good sound quality is pointless, but having good sound quality without being loud is also pointless.
User avatar
dwnrodeo
Posts: 1932
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:35 am
Location: MI

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dwnrodeo »

Kirghiz wrote:
bdub wrote:You're thinking of the TI2. I'm talking about the 2010/2011 TI line. The 5-channel is actually bigger in dimensions than the Elite.
That being said, I appreciate your feedback and tend to agree with you. Just trying to convince myself a bit more to spend money lol.
Oh, that's an even bigger difference then. That Ti line had the power ratings determined by dynamic power, and not rms power, so the Elite.5 actually makes more power. Iirc the Elite.5 I had was rated at 140 watts x 4 rms @ 4 ohm and over 750 watts rms @ 2 ohm and 1180some watts rms @ 1 ohm on the sub channel according to the birth sheet.
Not going from birthsheet, as I have stated, I've never owend either amplifier, but the manual ratings for each are: Ti1600.5 90 watts x4 @ 4ohm + 550 watts x 1 @ 2ohm, Elite.5 100 watts x 4 @ 4ohm + 700 watts x 1 @ 2ohm. I'm sure the Elite.5 is much more underrated than the Ti, as stated in the Elite.5 manual up to 30%, but at those specs there shouldn't be a noticeable audible difference based on power output alone. Rule of thumb, for every doubling of wattage you gain ~3db.
XS2300, XS2500, XS2300, X200.4, X100.2, Ti21000.4, Roadster 66

I'm gonna become a civil engineer. I'm gonna design septic tanks for playgrounds. Little kids can take shits! You idiot, what the hell do you do?
User avatar
dvnt88
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dvnt88 »

I have to go with the Elite.5 ...Best sounding amp I've heard to date and the sound quality is unreal compared to the long list of PG amps I've used over the years. I have mine currently installed, which replaced a TI500.4 and TI1200.1 (Old-Skool Titanium series , love them and are still my favorite amps besides the Elite series).
Audison Bit Ten
Hertz HSK163's (x2)
Hertz HX250 subs (x2)
Hertz HDP1
Hertz HDP4
PG Tantrum BassCUBE
XS Power D4900
Misc. PG Install Goodies


"Old-Skool TI-Whore"
Kirghiz
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:59 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by Kirghiz »

There shouldn't be a noticeable difference in the volume based on the power, no, but more power can lead to better sound quality by providing better control of the drivers. While that last statement is certainly debateable, 8) the Elites have far better hardware in them to promote better sound quality than the Ti's, and really that is inclusive to every other amp Phoenix Gold has ever made too.

I'd really like to see someone here do a head to head comparison of comparable MS, ZX, and Elite amps, you know, for the hell of it.
Being loud without good sound quality is pointless, but having good sound quality without being loud is also pointless.
Treesive
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 8:42 am

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by Treesive »

Can't comment on the greatness of the elite.5 but to date the elite.4 is the best sounding amp I have ever run and had power to keep up with today's stronger speakers to boot ( I run dyn 242's). Only amp I consider remotely close is the arc 4200 and I think it is mostly on floor noise and headroom.
SYSTEM:

Pioneer 80PRS
Us Amps 4300x (Upgrading to Elite.1) On its way!!
Us Amps 400x (Upgrading to Elite.4)
2X Soundsplinter rl-p 12" (Upgrading to Audiopulse lms Ultra 15)
bdub
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Harrison Hot Springs, BC, Canada

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by bdub »

Well, thanks in part to your comments, I'm now the proud (and broke) owner of an Elite.5 and an Elite.2!

Thanks for the input everyone, it was valuable as always. Be on the lookout for a TI1600.5, TI800.4, Bass Cube and PLD1 in the classifieds, unless I can sell them locally.
180 Amp alternator
Stinger Spp1200 battery
PG TDD5
Ipod Mini/Pure I-20 (optical to Bit1)
Fiio X5 (dig coax to Bit1)
Audison Bitone.1
Tru Tech Line-8isx
PG Elite.4 (tweets/mids)
PG Elite.2 (midbass)
PG TI21300.1 (subs)
PG Bass Cube
PG TI9 midbass
ScanSpeak 10F/4425G00 midrange
ScanSpeak Illuminator R3004/602000 tweets
Acoustic Elegance SBP15 subs
Kirghiz
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:59 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by Kirghiz »

fwiw I run a bass cube with my Elite.1. I wouldn't sell that.
Being loud without good sound quality is pointless, but having good sound quality without being loud is also pointless.
bdub
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Harrison Hot Springs, BC, Canada

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by bdub »

Yeah I just might. I was considering selling it and using the lpl, but it does offer a lot more flexibility. I was mainly just thinking of recouping some of the cost lol.
180 Amp alternator
Stinger Spp1200 battery
PG TDD5
Ipod Mini/Pure I-20 (optical to Bit1)
Fiio X5 (dig coax to Bit1)
Audison Bitone.1
Tru Tech Line-8isx
PG Elite.4 (tweets/mids)
PG Elite.2 (midbass)
PG TI21300.1 (subs)
PG Bass Cube
PG TI9 midbass
ScanSpeak 10F/4425G00 midrange
ScanSpeak Illuminator R3004/602000 tweets
Acoustic Elegance SBP15 subs
User avatar
dvnt88
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dvnt88 »

I run a basscube with my Elite.5 and it really wakes / opens up the sub output (running an IDMAX10D4v3 at a 2ohm load) ...definitely use the cube, you won't be disappointed. :twisted:
Audison Bit Ten
Hertz HSK163's (x2)
Hertz HX250 subs (x2)
Hertz HDP1
Hertz HDP4
PG Tantrum BassCUBE
XS Power D4900
Misc. PG Install Goodies


"Old-Skool TI-Whore"
Kirghiz
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:59 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by Kirghiz »

I am in sales, and there is a phrase I jokingly tell people to get them to buy.

"It's only money, and you'll make more". :lol:
Being loud without good sound quality is pointless, but having good sound quality without being loud is also pointless.
dbjury
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dbjury »

I just swapped out my zx450 and zx500 for the elite .5. There is def more power there but space of sound has changed. A sense of smoothness. Currently only running 4 ohm sub so amp not being asked to do much. Have 2 ohm spg-555 Boston coming.

The biggest thing I notice is the smile on my face. That's when you know you have an improvement.

Worth every cent
BMW 2006 530D E60
(yet to fit) Alpine 9887 CD/Ipod/Reciever: Boston Acoustics ZX6: Boston Acoustics SPG-555: Phoenix Gold ELITE .5
bdub
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Harrison Hot Springs, BC, Canada

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by bdub »

dbjury wrote:I just swapped out my zx450 and zx500 for the elite .5. There is def more power there but space of sound has changed. A sense of smoothness. Currently only running 4 ohm sub so amp not being asked to do much. Have 2 ohm spg-555 Boston coming.

The biggest thing I notice is the smile on my face. That's when you know you have an improvement.

Worth every cent
This is great to hear! I used to run that exact combo as well, so if it puts it to shame, that's great.

BTW, what year is your Suby? Mine is an 05 LGT.
180 Amp alternator
Stinger Spp1200 battery
PG TDD5
Ipod Mini/Pure I-20 (optical to Bit1)
Fiio X5 (dig coax to Bit1)
Audison Bitone.1
Tru Tech Line-8isx
PG Elite.4 (tweets/mids)
PG Elite.2 (midbass)
PG TI21300.1 (subs)
PG Bass Cube
PG TI9 midbass
ScanSpeak 10F/4425G00 midrange
ScanSpeak Illuminator R3004/602000 tweets
Acoustic Elegance SBP15 subs
dbjury
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dbjury »

[/quote]

This is great to hear! I used to run that exact combo as well, so if it puts it to shame, that's great.

BTW, what year is your Suby? Mine is an 05 LGT.[/quote]

Mines 2003 wagon
Image
Going to do nice boot install on this
Looking forward to getting the router out and shaping some wood. Will post to forum when this starts
BMW 2006 530D E60
(yet to fit) Alpine 9887 CD/Ipod/Reciever: Boston Acoustics ZX6: Boston Acoustics SPG-555: Phoenix Gold ELITE .5
bdub
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Harrison Hot Springs, BC, Canada

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by bdub »

Wow, love the pic and I'm jealous of that front bumper you guys get overseas. Are you on LGT.com? I don't have any pics there but here's my mod list: 05 LGT

Looking forward to your build log.
180 Amp alternator
Stinger Spp1200 battery
PG TDD5
Ipod Mini/Pure I-20 (optical to Bit1)
Fiio X5 (dig coax to Bit1)
Audison Bitone.1
Tru Tech Line-8isx
PG Elite.4 (tweets/mids)
PG Elite.2 (midbass)
PG TI21300.1 (subs)
PG Bass Cube
PG TI9 midbass
ScanSpeak 10F/4425G00 midrange
ScanSpeak Illuminator R3004/602000 tweets
Acoustic Elegance SBP15 subs
dbjury
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Elite.5 vs TI1600.5

Post by dbjury »

Holy. That's some mod list. I keep my major mods to my race car. Only replaced suspension with bilstein height adjustables front simota 4 pot calipers and rotors so she stops when I need. Just going to do basic dump pipe flow and reprogram ecu. Running rota 8.5" wheels with 235/40/18 good years. Be interesting to see pics of yours.
BMW 2006 530D E60
(yet to fit) Alpine 9887 CD/Ipod/Reciever: Boston Acoustics ZX6: Boston Acoustics SPG-555: Phoenix Gold ELITE .5
dbjury
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:41 pm

Post by dbjury »

Double post please delete
BMW 2006 530D E60
(yet to fit) Alpine 9887 CD/Ipod/Reciever: Boston Acoustics ZX6: Boston Acoustics SPG-555: Phoenix Gold ELITE .5
Post Reply