Part Number Question On Tantrum 1200.1

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
Post Reply
dako
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Tampa

Part Number Question On Tantrum 1200.1

Post by dako »

Hey Guys - I just got my 1200.1 back from PG today and there was a part number they replaced that I'm not familiar with. It's part U102. Just wondering if anyone out there might have an idea what that is, just so I can keep track of what's been replaced on the amp. Thanks!
2007 Scion Tc
Kenwood DDX9907XR
JL Audio TwK88
JL Audio HD900/5
Morel Virtus 602
IDQ12 V.4 D2 Sealed
dako
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Tampa

Post by dako »

Did some digging around online last night and couldn't come up with anything. Does U102 refer to a position on the circuit board maybe? I know...I've got way too much free time on my hands. Would be nice to know what exactly was repaired. I know when I called PG, they were saying how "U102 was replaced, part cost was $53.00, etc..."
2007 Scion Tc
Kenwood DDX9907XR
JL Audio TwK88
JL Audio HD900/5
Morel Virtus 602
IDQ12 V.4 D2 Sealed
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Post by stipud »

I think U102 is the Tripath chip. It would be the name of the location on the circuit board.
dako
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Tampa

Post by dako »

Ahhh! Thank you. I was hoping that's what they were referring to.
2007 Scion Tc
Kenwood DDX9907XR
JL Audio TwK88
JL Audio HD900/5
Morel Virtus 602
IDQ12 V.4 D2 Sealed
User avatar
rolandk
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:36 am
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post by rolandk »

U102 is indeed the Tripath chip, they must have found a secret stash! :)
dako
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Tampa

Post by dako »

And for that, I'm seriously grateful. I was thinking after sending it in and getting a general consensus here of what might've been wrong with it, I'd have a really stylish looking doorstop on my hands. :wink:
2007 Scion Tc
Kenwood DDX9907XR
JL Audio TwK88
JL Audio HD900/5
Morel Virtus 602
IDQ12 V.4 D2 Sealed
User avatar
Me-262
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:52 am
Location: Ottawa

Post by Me-262 »

Hey dude, did you still need my 1200.1 ? You haven't checked your PM's in forever :cry:
User avatar
Delftenaar
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:27 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Delftenaar »

Does anybody know if this 1200.1 produces the same power at 2 Ohm as 4 Ohm :?: Considering it is only rated at 4 :?
Audison VRX 1.500.2
Audison VRX 4.300.2
Audison VRX 6.420.2
Genesis Four channel
Genesis Four channel
Genesis DM200
PPI 430iX
Crossfire vr404
Rockford 1051s
Rockford 851x
Steg K2.01
Steg K2.01
Steg K2.02
Steg K2.03
Steg K4.02
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Post by stipud »

Yes, it will produce the same wattage at 2 ohms BUT it will draw more current, and get much hotter, and it won't sound as good.
User avatar
Delftenaar
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:27 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Delftenaar »

By 'it doesn't sound as good' I guess you mean the damping :?:
Audison VRX 1.500.2
Audison VRX 4.300.2
Audison VRX 6.420.2
Genesis Four channel
Genesis Four channel
Genesis DM200
PPI 430iX
Crossfire vr404
Rockford 1051s
Rockford 851x
Steg K2.01
Steg K2.01
Steg K2.02
Steg K2.03
Steg K4.02
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Post by stipud »

Lower damping is a small part of the issue. Since you are running the amp below its rated impedance, you will be stressing it. I would expect to see much lower THD as well (not that that really matters on a subwoofer). Having a fan cool it may be a good idea.
Post Reply