deathcloud wrote:Oh and forgot to add, maybe it was because I did have a line driver hooked up. I have a TLD66 hooked up, if you don't have one I think u should get one. I read that they like high input voltages.

thanks,would the line driver effect the sound quality?

Actually now that I think about it, IIRC Jacampb2 tested several of his ZX and Ti amps, and found they had the same rail voltage. In fact I believe his Ti was higher. So this would indicate that the headroom potential is the same for both, and it fluctuates from amp to amp. Personally I would take ...

Eric D wrote:I think the original ZX amps sound better. But, that is just my opinion, and I am sure others would disagree with me.

thanks,another question is zx 500 and ti 600 both the specs are same?

Eric D wrote:ZXti and Ti are the exact same amps. The only difference is the silkscreened model number on the outside of the chassis, one says ZXti, and the other says Ti.

The original ZX line are different from the ZXti-Ti line.

so actually the sound of them all are same?

stipud wrote:ZX has the most headroom but is less reliable

ZXti and Ti are the same thing, more reliable but less headroom than ZX

thanks,but i saw a reiew that ZXti got some goldplate inside and ti no?and the sound quality is ZXti and V2 better than Ti?
isnt it?

:roll: looking for a amp for my system,i just sold my Xenon 200.4 last night, now i'm have a ti600.2 for front component only(3way:dynaudio mw160 midbass,peerless midrange and tweeter) looking another with my JBL sub,so ZX,ZX TI, TI is my 1st choice :roll: (the sound of TI is Xenon cannot give to me...

awesome!!man,really nice look!

really,really,really nice!!

thanks for your infomation~~