another perfect transaction and James went the extra mile !

love the boot, very clean and practical. with the 13 in the footwell that gives new meaning to " bass in your face" ......

terminals in perfect condition and shipped quick.

ttocs wrote:oh boy, HERE WE GO!!!!

damn I wish I could eat popcorn....

LOL and I just wanted some info....................

Thanks dwnrodeo !

I guess we starting to show our age !

According to Phoenix Gold " So how do we get max power at 2 ohms bridged? Disable the switching power supply to stay in High Voltage, this is easily done by snipping two diodes underneath the far left IC chip on the vertical board that has the Power LED's on it. It will stay in High Voltage and...

did this get finished? was looking awesome.

Have you considered running them active from the ZX450? That's how I'll be running my L1 & L3. Apparently active operation is highly recommended for the Legatia line, and the rated output of the ZX450 should be more than enough as you won't be asking them to produce any real bass (that's what t...

Pillow wrote:... Why not just use a ZX500?

The ZX450 is an awesome amp, but to me it is best used active on a component set or 4-way.

IMHO

Well I have a ZX450 not a ZX500 hence my question. Also a ZX450 puts out 250w x2 (when bridged) compared to 150wx2 on a ZX500 (unbridged)

I just looked at the amp and the front channel goes from 30-600Hz same as the back but front has a 10x frequency multiplier switch so you could have a different range if you wanted.

excellent. My Hybrid Audio Legatia's arrived yesterday so I am deciding how to set it up......

amps are zx450
Tantrum 600.4 and 1200.1

Splits L41-2x and L8
Sub JL 13w7

sweet. I love it when a plan comes together !

As title states I am considering bridging the amp so as to have the 250rms per side for the splits. Would this double the distortion and not be advisable? Am running passive for the splits obviously and active off my 600.4 on my 8" midbasses Obviously I will be wiring the RCA's so as to keep th...

Sweet. I will bypass the EQ for the sub. Thanks for confirming what I suspected.

Would it be completely terrible to run the front stage though the EQ and the sub RCA straight to the amp from the headunit so bypass the EQ?

Probably 85% or more of the audible range will be from the front stage anyway considering I am running a 3 way setup.

fuzzysnuggleduck wrote:The manual says the inputs will be summed...

Thats why I thought it would work using balanced and RCA inputs.
Issue is that amps then both get full range input.

i would pick up a nice 406a and be done with it... Then I still loose head unit sub control. At this point I may see how it sounds just running the front stage ( HAT 841 set) off the EQ and run the signal for the sub direct from head unit to amp. Amps are Tantrum 600.4 , 1200.1 and may add ZX450 Su...

To clarify I want to run front RCAs to tBat to Eq ( balanced)
Sub RCA from Head unit (Pioneer AvicHD3) to EQ ( RCA input)

This is instead of daisy chaining from one amp to the next or running sub channel straight to Tantrum 1200.1

Hi everyone. Got a quick question about my 232. Manual says you can run balanced and RCA simultaneously and have 2 sources. What I want to do is run balanced into it for my fronts from the tBat and RCA from sub out on head unit to retain sub control. Is this possible or do I have to sacrifice the su...