NEXT CONTEST - RTE 66

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:44 am

here we have pic's of the text off a rte 66.
find the two typo's/inconsistencies within the text
and win a PG Key-chain flash light

one of the ones i see/think that is an inconsistency could very well be intentional by PG artist back in the day- but nonetheless, it is an inconsistency.

hope that doesnt give it away

good luck
it will either be very tough or very easy
hopefully not as hard as the baseball score contest

m

lowblueranger · Post by **lowblueranger** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:17 am

It says high pass and hi pass x-over. Then it says outputs and input for the rca's. It also has a low-pass with a dash in between one time.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:24 am

well you know i was going to say that there were three inconsistancies...BUT the one you pointed out couldnt be avoided due to the space avail to the cross-over area.

So while that is one, (the high pass vs. hi-pass), it isnt one of the ones i have in mind... due to space constraints and cant fault them for that. BUT there is defi one typo, and another typo/inconsistancy i was thinking of.

and i dont see where it says outputs on the rca's that you spoke of...?

Post by **joerg** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:24 am

Shouldn´t it say REAR low pass speaker outputs

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:34 am

^^ no in fact no- i dont believe so anyways...
low pass is the secondary part of the 44, and not the 25.... the 25 end of amp is for rear fill (well of course you could use it for whatever one would like) BUT the 44 on the 66 is for front stage and sub out, while the 25 is for rear fill.

Post by **kg1961** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:38 am

joerg wrote:Shouldn´t it say REAR low pass speaker outputs

I thought the same thing at first

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:45 am

incidentally these are fairly subtle typo's or inconsistencies
so it looks like it might take a lil bit for someone to see/figure out...

marko · Post by **marko** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:29 am

if you look at the "modification" manual for route 66 it shows you ho to rework the x-overs and re-direct sub out to m25 section, just a thought..

Post by **ttocs** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:57 am

above the line is bold lettering, below the line is normal.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:19 am

^ no sry not it
it might be one... but hard to tell for sure. but no, wasnt the two i was after

Post by **ttocs** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:05 am

on the first bridged mono, is that a scratch in the N or is that a different font?

I still think the top is a little thicker then the bottom.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:10 am

yes a scratch in the N
i feel confident that there is consistency with the font- believe it is all helvetica or some variation of helvetica

and perhaps below the line is not bold or vise-versa...but that could very well be intentional...but looking at the amp in hand/person... i do not see any difference in font style with the pics i took. Think it might look lighter due to the different color of text that is below the line- idk just guessing...but no while it might be true... i dont think that was un-intentional... and not one of the two i was trying to demonstrate.

gbody805 · Post by **gbody805** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:37 pm

The letter B from bridged and the leftter L from left line up with the letter P in speaker in the two top photos but in ofset in the last photo.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:42 pm

^^ no
and
^^ no

Sry dan... not it...

no actually they are typo's... not in the sense that anything is miss-spelled...BUT typo's in the sense of inconsistency/ies.

gbody805 · Post by **gbody805** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:42 pm

Hi-pass cross over symbol is offset in the first photo.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:45 pm

^^ nope... in fact they all are a little off-set in fact-
which is one of the reasons mine were always a little off. as when i traced, i simply traced-

but since then i have fixed MY off-setness

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:50 pm

okay guys here is a hint

one of the typo's/inconsistencies can be seen in just one pic.

the other one- it takes two [ to be all-right ]

Post by **ttocs** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:08 pm

the only thing I see is the remote low-pass has a dash in it where the others do not.

oldschoolfan · Post by **oldschoolfan** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:29 pm

I got it I got it! They spelled bass wrong, like the fish!

dedlyjedly · Post by **dedlyjedly** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:48 pm

joerg wrote:Shouldn´t it say REAR low pass speaker outputs

No, it should be labeled SUB low pass speaker outputs. All three of the gain pots are differentiated FRONT, REAR, and SUB. The corresponding speaker outputs are also labeled, FRONT and REAR, thus the SUB specific label is missing on the third set of outputs.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:52 pm

sub / low-pass I didnt squabble about that...

but ttocs did get one of them...

only one winner though guys!

c'mon ttocs
where's the other
where's the other

Post by **ttocs** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:55 pm

high pass and highpass and hi pass and the dashes.

dedlyjedly · Post by **dedlyjedly** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:55 pm

Definitely an inconsistency though.

And....HIGHPASS is not a word.

Post by **ttocs** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:56 pm

hahahaah beat ya! you have my address already.

Post by **mhyde71** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:57 pm

thats right

whew!

yup ttocs looks like he gets it...

highpass vs. high pass

low-pass and low pass