Page 1 of 1
THE STINGER alive again
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:16 pm
by joerg
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:23 pm
by str3atwarrior
This looks good!
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:51 pm
by JK
thats the real deal.... looks like 80-100 spent on that one...
to rich for my blood

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:56 pm
by ttocs
man that must be wicked across the pond with that thing, it sounds evil as fuck

!
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:59 pm
by joerg
40bucks spent on every horse

And it does throw 1500 of them onto the ground when taking off

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:21 pm
by JK
well! thats 60.. theres gota be more than that in it
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:28 pm
by joerg
Nope! My friend bought the chassis without drivetrain for 9000GBP in England. Another 1000eur for getting it over to Austria. The engine with transmission made it up to 27500eur with all the needed parts. Count another 7500eur for all the other stuff like paintjob, graphics, tires, gas tank and all the small crap..... That makes it a total of around 45000eur which is exactly 57 955,5 US-Dollar by todays exchange rate.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:38 pm
by JK
damn! thats not bad..... if there was labor tacked on it would add up to more of what i thought. its always good to know how to do it yourself. u can save a ton of cash..
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:44 pm
by joerg
Rule number one: Never count the labor u throw into something u enjoy

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:47 pm
by ttocs
I figured you had more then his estimate into it, good work.
THAT is the tattoo you want your mechanic to have when working on your mopar.
I hope it doesn't blow up on you again....
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:53 pm
by joerg
We are looking forward to make our first full 1/4mile run this time! We now eliminated 3 weak links in the chain at once. The valve springs were replaced by new and stronger ones, the self build intake manifold has been replaced by a INDY intake manifold and the ratio from blower RPM´s to crankshaft RPM´s is now at 0% and not 20% over
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:06 am
by oldschoolfan
Is that the Charuda in the background?
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:05 am
by stipud
So you reduced the supercharger pulley size? Less boost is less power right? I guess if it keeps you from blowing the intake again then it's all good!
That thing is suuch a beast

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:33 am
by kg1961
I though the small pully mean it turn smore making more power
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:51 am
by NewOldStock
stipud wrote:So you reduced the supercharger pulley size? Less boost is less power right? I guess if it keeps you from blowing the intake again then it's all good!
smaller SC pulley = faster rotation of the screws = more air foced into the engine = more power... or a horrible lean condition that will blow the motor

... not that I know that from personal experience.

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:54 am
by stipud
Right I got the pullies backwards.

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:46 pm
by joerg
stipud wrote:Right I got the pullies backwards.

That´s right u got em backwards. We have a bigger pulley on the supercharger now. 5 teeth more then the other had.
And we bougth an intake from INDY now. It´s not a selfbuild one anymore.
oldschoolfan wrote:Is that the Charuda in the background?
Yes it is!
