Hey guys, I been getting my INA-W910 sound settings all fixed up and I have another question.
The last headunit I had was an IDA-X305 with the Imprint processor. I used all the manual settings. The Q factors(bandwidth) of the Imprint P.EQ were 1, 1.5, and 3. It showed a little picture of a wave getting more narrow or more wide depending where you settled.
The W910 has Q factors listed as 1-4 only. Can I assume that 1 is the widest Q setting and 4 is the most narrow? Or could it go the other way? The reason I ask is because the bass setting that is connected to the P.EQ is labelled Wide1-Wide4 which would make me think 4 is the widest setting.
I was going to run a test tone but quickly realized a test tone at one frequency probably won't help me.
Any of you have an Alpine unit with Q factors 1-4 and know which way narrows and widens the bandwidth? I am not sure if I will be able to listen to music and tell if I am widening or narrowing the frequency bandwidth.
Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
- Phoenixcolt
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:45 pm
- Location: New Britain, CT
- Contact:
Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
Rides History-www.cardomain.com/id/HotColt22
JL HD1200/1
JL HD600/4
ID XS65
IDMAX 10D4 V3
On Tap/Stash:
DQS+DDC
Ti12D Elite
RSd12
JL HD1200/1
JL HD600/4
ID XS65
IDMAX 10D4 V3
On Tap/Stash:
DQS+DDC
Ti12D Elite
RSd12
Re: Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
Re: Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
under the pic on the lower right -
f, of a damped oscillator is shown on a graph of energy versus frequency. The Q factor of the damped oscillator, or filter, is f0 / Δf. The higher the Q, the narrower and 'sharper' the peak is.
f, of a damped oscillator is shown on a graph of energy versus frequency. The Q factor of the damped oscillator, or filter, is f0 / Δf. The higher the Q, the narrower and 'sharper' the peak is.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
- Phoenixcolt
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:45 pm
- Location: New Britain, CT
- Contact:
Re: Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
Ok cool, I assumed this was the case but then started doubting myself.
It's a bit misleading to me then, that the bass adjustment, which is connected to the first band of the P.EQ is titled wide1 through wide4.
It's a bit misleading to me then, that the bass adjustment, which is connected to the first band of the P.EQ is titled wide1 through wide4.
Rides History-www.cardomain.com/id/HotColt22
JL HD1200/1
JL HD600/4
ID XS65
IDMAX 10D4 V3
On Tap/Stash:
DQS+DDC
Ti12D Elite
RSd12
JL HD1200/1
JL HD600/4
ID XS65
IDMAX 10D4 V3
On Tap/Stash:
DQS+DDC
Ti12D Elite
RSd12
Re: Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
I was taugh Q was short for quality, or how well it filtered the signal. The higher quality filter will only allow a small amount of signals through where a lower quality will let a higher range of freq through.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
- Phoenixcolt
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:45 pm
- Location: New Britain, CT
- Contact:
Re: Alpine Parametric EQ Bandwidth Question
Yeah, the way you described it makes sense. I have always thought of it as the width of the signal, so if the center frequency is 63 hz, a q of 1 allows the most spill over to frequencies below and above the center frequency where a max q, say 5 for instance, is the most focussed on the center frequency with the least spill over.ttocs wrote:I was taugh Q was short for quality, or how well it filtered the signal. The higher quality filter will only allow a small amount of signals through where a lower quality will let a higher range of freq through.
Rides History-www.cardomain.com/id/HotColt22
JL HD1200/1
JL HD600/4
ID XS65
IDMAX 10D4 V3
On Tap/Stash:
DQS+DDC
Ti12D Elite
RSd12
JL HD1200/1
JL HD600/4
ID XS65
IDMAX 10D4 V3
On Tap/Stash:
DQS+DDC
Ti12D Elite
RSd12