M100 into 2 ohm mono?
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 8:14 am
Cant his amp handle that, I see on amp guts it says it can but doesnt give a spec for it. What kind of power should it do at 2 ohm mono if it can handle it?
Celebrating the Phoenix Gold legacy, and oldschool car audio!
https://www.phoenixphorum.com/
I am looking for something for my sub which is a dual 4 so its got to be 2 or 8 ohm monofuzzysnuggleduck wrote:This is 100% anecdotal but my M100 failed not long after I started running her at 2 ohms mono. It was running really hot.
My opinion? Meager difference in power output isn't worth the risk.
You can run it at 4 ohms stereo if you have the knowledge to gain match your channels but if you're just looking at which amp to buy there is likely a better match for your sub in another amp.scottn29 wrote:I am looking for something for my sub which is a dual 4 so its got to be 2 or 8 ohm monofuzzysnuggleduck wrote:This is 100% anecdotal but my M100 failed not long after I started running her at 2 ohms mono. It was running really hot.
My opinion? Meager difference in power output isn't worth the risk.
Does the M100 have independant gains for the left and right channel?fuzzysnuggleduck wrote:You can run it at 4 ohms stereo if you have the knowledge to gain match your channels but if you're just looking at which amp to buy there is likely a better match for your sub in another amp.scottn29 wrote:I am looking for something for my sub which is a dual 4 so its got to be 2 or 8 ohm monofuzzysnuggleduck wrote:This is 100% anecdotal but my M100 failed not long after I started running her at 2 ohms mono. It was running really hot.
My opinion? Meager difference in power output isn't worth the risk.
Haha! Caught me! I didn't check but now that you mention it, it does in fact have a single master gain control on the outside. Which only makes sense. That's twice in two days that I blurted shit out without thinking!scottn29 wrote:Does the M100 have independant gains for the left and right channel?
I dont think I would be happy with it at 8 ohm mono if its putting out half of its power at 4ohm. i am one of those that like headroom in his amps. I just picked up a MS2250 to use, that will work betterBfowler wrote:8ohm mono would accomplish the same thing?
i just meant compared to 4ohm stereo. i think 8ohms would be a bit of a waste alsoscottn29 wrote:I dont think I would be happy with it at 8 ohm mono if its putting out half of its power at 4ohm. i am one of those that like headroom in his amps. I just picked up a MS2250 to use, that will work betterBfowler wrote:8ohm mono would accomplish the same thing?
You do realize that half power is only a 3dB difference, right?scottn29 wrote:I dont think I would be happy with it at 8 ohm mono if its putting out half of its power at 4ohm. i am one of those that like headroom in his amps. I just picked up a MS2250 to use, that will work betterBfowler wrote:8ohm mono would accomplish the same thing?
Yes I do realize that, but you also have a higher chance of clipping when you push it hard with less power, thats why I always like headroom, cleaner signal is always a good thingstipud wrote:You do realize that half power is only a 3dB difference, right?scottn29 wrote:I dont think I would be happy with it at 8 ohm mono if its putting out half of its power at 4ohm. i am one of those that like headroom in his amps. I just picked up a MS2250 to use, that will work betterBfowler wrote:8ohm mono would accomplish the same thing?
Technically you have more "headroom" at 8 ohms than you do at 4. The amp is capable of putting out more power, but because of the load/gains/etc, it isn't. You are running the parts below their maximum levels, so when the occasional dynamic musical spike comes along, the amp is able to take it in stride.scottn29 wrote:Yes I do realize that, but you also have a higher chance of clipping when you push it hard with less power, thats why I always like headroom, cleaner signal is always a good thing