Inverted Subs

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
Post Reply
Robbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:15 am

Inverted Subs

Post by Robbie »

Hi, i am sure this is a huge topic however i am trying to understand the basic theory behind inverting sub's

for example do you use standard sub's? I am guessing that you need one designed for a ported box and not sealed or are they what i remember as free air subs?

would the box volume be the same as one with standard mounting?

Apart from the fact that they look cool is there any benefit to sound quality or power?

Thanks in advance
Robbie
User avatar
Bfowler
Briaans..... BRIAAAAANNNNNNS
Posts: 10764
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:06 am
Location: So easy, a cavewomen could do him

Post by Bfowler »

there is surprisingly little to no sound difference!

the front of the cone is still in a enclosure, so you dont need any special or different sub. just make the enclosure to the same air specs as you would have if it was mounted normally. (account for the driver displacement, so .1-.2 cubic feet larger)
my ex-girlfriend said "its car audio or me"
i've had tougher choices at a soda machine...
Robbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:15 am

Post by Robbie »

That is exactly the information i needed, definately the way im going to go

Thanks

Just need to figure out which sub to use now =)

Rob
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14783
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

the only warning I would give is to be sure it is lined up perfectly or else the surround moving will wear out faster rubbing aginst the box. YOu will also get a little more spac out of your box since the motor/magnet is not displacing the air now.

IF you have one sub forward, and one backward you will need to wire on of them out of phase.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
User avatar
Eric D
Short Bus Driver
Posts: 4255
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:50 am

Post by Eric D »

ttocs wrote:the only warning I would give is to be sure it is lined up perfectly or else the surround moving will wear out faster rubbing aginst the box. YOu will also get a little more spac out of your box since the motor/magnet is not displacing the air now.

IF you have one sub forward, and one backward you will need to wire on of them out of phase.
Good call. I have seen more than one sub mounted backwards and not aligned properly, then the surround was trashed.
Got "schooled" by member shawn k on May 10th, 2011...
No longer really "in tune" with the audio industry, and probably have not been for some time.
Hands down the forum's most ignorant member...
Don't even know what Ohm's law is...
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14783
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

it is amazing how fast they can break down, especially the foam surrounds.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
User avatar
NewOldStock
Posts: 678
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:07 am
Location: SW Washington

Post by NewOldStock »

Eric D wrote:
ttocs wrote:the only warning I would give is to be sure it is lined up perfectly or else the surround moving will wear out faster rubbing aginst the box. YOu will also get a little more spac out of your box since the motor/magnet is not displacing the air now.

IF you have one sub forward, and one backward you will need to wire on of them out of phase.
Good call. I have seen more than one sub mounted backwards and not aligned properly, then the surround was trashed.
holy sh*t... isnt that the 6th sign of the apocalypse?

X3 on the alignment... make sure your sub hole is true-round and has the edge rounded off so its not sharp.
MX2 Crossover
Sapphire 1.5x - Sold
Roadster66 #11 - Sold
(2) RSdC 102 10" Subwoofers - Sold
Robbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:15 am

Post by Robbie »

Now one forward and one back, thats an interesting suggestion. would you use a ported box at double the volume?

Again is it a case of asthetics? or is there a benafit in volume / quality to this design?

Thanks for all of the comments

Robbie
longboard
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 12:04 am

Post by longboard »

and remember to run it out of phase!
1,al dd10,2 al 15 farad powercores,2nakamichi cd400s,1 xenon 200.4,2 xenon 1200.1,3 sets ti elite9s,2 sets ti elite 5s 1 set ti elite 6s 4 sets ti elite tweets 2 13w7 subs,9 ti rmds,3 pg show pieces 1 ms2250,2 zx350s,2 zx 200s,2 zx250s,1 zx450v2,1 475 ti
User avatar
paintguy
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by paintguy »

Robbie wrote:Now one forward and one back, thats an interesting suggestion. would you use a ported box at double the volume?

Again is it a case of asthetics? or is there a benafit in volume / quality to this design?

Thanks for all of the comments

Robbie
There are alleged to be sonic advantages in this configuration as any non-linearities in the drivers suspension systems are cancelled out by one moving forward as one moves backwards.

Whether you'd actually hear it or not is another matter. I doubt my dodgy old ears would! :lol:
User avatar
Misfire
Posts: 1170
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:35 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by Misfire »

Years ago I had 4 JL audio tens in the clam shell configuration running off an M50. Some of the most accurate bass I have ever had. Too bad I didn't keep those tens, I did keep the fiberglass housing though. Would love to run four Ti tens with it..... would be sweet I bet.
MS275, MS2250ta, MS2125TA, Bandit, M44, ZX200, EQ215, EQ230, TX2, PDL1, TBAT Trans+Recvr w/cable
Robbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:15 am

Post by Robbie »

Thanks again for all of the advice, off to fibreglass my first box today.

Clam shell design, sounds interesting however cant picture it at the moment

Robbie
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14783
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

put two subwoofers together, cones facing one another..... looks like a clam shell.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
User avatar
GX3
Posts: 1424
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: Mi
Contact:

Post by GX3 »

clam shell= Isobaric design If I remember correctly it requires on average half the box volume and produces a lower response
ZX950 X2 1 blk 1 wht
MS1KTA black NIC
MS1KTA white NIB
MS2250TA (x3) 1 in Blue 1 in Red
MS2125TA
MAC200 NIB
MS275 (x2) 1 NIB
MPS2240 NIB
Tantrum 500.2 (x2)
SA1.0 (x2)
ZPA 0.5 X2
ZPA 0.3 X3
Ti DD10 ............
User avatar
Misfire
Posts: 1170
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:35 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by Misfire »

Well clam shell does kinda fit... gotta love the technical terms! lol. I can't remember the the box dimensions, but it was small. It sounded sweet.
MS275, MS2250ta, MS2125TA, Bandit, M44, ZX200, EQ215, EQ230, TX2, PDL1, TBAT Trans+Recvr w/cable
todd217
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:36 pm
Location: rantoul illinois

Post by todd217 »

its called isobaric. when you run them isobaric you old need half the box size that 1 needed. so you could run 4 subs in the same size box as only 1. imagine 4 12s in about 1.5 cuft. the motors of the subs also work together allowing for more control and better sound quality but output is reduced.
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Post by stipud »

todd217 wrote:its called isobaric. when you run them isobaric you old need half the box size that 1 needed. so you could run 4 subs in the same size box as only 1. imagine 4 12s in about 1.5 cuft. the motors of the subs also work together allowing for more control and better sound quality but output is reduced.
That's not how it works. Effectively all running isobaric does is double your power handling. Other than that it makes two drivers take the same box displacement as one driver... but you don't gain any more output. All it does is let you put double the power on it, which gives you an added 3dB at most.
User avatar
Bfowler
Briaans..... BRIAAAAANNNNNNS
Posts: 10764
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:06 am
Location: So easy, a cavewomen could do him

Post by Bfowler »

yeah that makes sense. for lower bass i think you are thinking of passive radiator. that makes the cone act heavier which makes for lower (yet slower) output
my ex-girlfriend said "its car audio or me"
i've had tougher choices at a soda machine...
todd217
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:36 pm
Location: rantoul illinois

Post by todd217 »

what is not right?
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Post by stipud »

todd217 wrote:what is not right?
It lets you run TWO subs in the airspace of one sub, not FOUR. Basically it lets two subs act as one, so you can double the power handling... that's it. Your cone area is not doubled so it's no louder on the same power.

Considering the cost of two woofers there is very little benefit to this method, since you can almost always buy better subs with more power handling for the price of two lower power handling woofers if it's really necessary. Mounting the woofers separately with double the airspace is preferred since you gain 3dB in output from having double the displacement.
todd217
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:36 pm
Location: rantoul illinois

Post by todd217 »

no that is right. if 1 sub needs 1.5 then you put it in a isobaric configuration now your down to .75 for those 2 and another 2 gives you 1.5. that is why people used it back in the day to use smaller boxes.
User avatar
shawn k
Posts: 757
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Maine

Post by shawn k »

There's a lot of good information about the isobaric design here, but also a few myths that should be cleared up.

A small enclosure requirement is the one and only benefit to isobaric: Two identical drivers in an Isobaric configuration requires 1/2 of the internal space of just one driver.

An isobaric does "not": improve SQ, have a lower response, have better control, or improve/double power handling.

In an isobaric configuration only "one" driver is displacing air. Therefore you will have the output and overall performance of "one" driver. Power handling isn't really doubled as you need to power two drivers as apposed to just one(power handling is still for "two" drivers). It's easy to misinterpret this since it makes sense that with two identical drivers power handling would be doubled, but you have to remember that you are limited to the single driver that's displacing air and it's excursion limits.
In fact, an isobaric design requires "double" the power to achieve the same spl as a non-isobaric configuration. This in effect makes it a relatively inefficient design and the more drivers you use, the more ineffiecient the system becomes :hmm:

todd217
that is why people used it back in the day to use smaller boxes
Absolutely! Back in the late 80's-mid 90's it was common to see 12" drivers needing 2-3 cu ft of internal air space for adequate performance!

paintguy
There are alleged to be sonic advantages in this configuration as any non-linearities in the drivers suspension systems are cancelled out by one moving forward as one moves backwards.

Whether you'd actually hear it or not is another matter. I doubt my dodgy old ears would!
:clap: :clap: :clap:
This is true and I'm very glad you brought this up! But as you said, it's highly unlikely to be audibly noticable. :wink:
Last edited by shawn k on Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AKA "THE HATER"
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14783
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

I did one system with 4 12" xmax(2 forwards, 2 backwards) driven off of 2 zx600tis back in the day and it was the loudest system I had ever heard. After tuning it, it vibrated one of the 6ft florescent lights out of its socket, thankfully in the bay next to it and not over it. Funny as hell as me and the other installer cranked it up for a few secs to the point it made our vision blurry and we never saw it fall as it was in both our our blindspots on the passenger side. We were both just confused as hell at what blew up to make all the smoke/fumes.

2 months later he came in complaining that he could no longer open his trunk as it had rattled lock mechanism so violently it broke it. Wouldn't open with the lever, the key or the alarm.

Not sayin it was the mysterious forward-backward phenomina or just dumb luck but that was definitly the best booming system I ever got to build.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
Post Reply