2 ohm vs 4 ohm comps

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
Post Reply
User avatar
12voltjunky
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

2 ohm vs 4 ohm comps

Post by 12voltjunky »

im running a ti500.4 and am wondering how a set of 2 ohm comps would perform up front. basically, would the lower impedance compromise the damping factor or overall sq of the front stage? and if so, how much?
1- Zx 400 Ti
1- Ti 600.2
1- Ti 500.4 (resurrected by valeks1)
2- Ti 500.4
2- Ti 1000.2
2-Ti RMD, Lpl, PG 1/0 Ga
Ti 6.5 comps, Ti 5x7 coaxials
User avatar
Eric D
Short Bus Driver
Posts: 4255
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:50 am

Post by Eric D »

Good luck finding a nice set of 2 ohm components. Pretty much all known quality components are around 4 ohms nominally.
Got "schooled" by member shawn k on May 10th, 2011...
No longer really "in tune" with the audio industry, and probably have not been for some time.
Hands down the forum's most ignorant member...
Don't even know what Ohm's law is...
User avatar
The Golden One
Quarantined
Quarantined
Posts: 717
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 3:58 pm
Location: Tinkle Town T,N

Post by The Golden One »

mb quart used to make some musicomp components that with the crossover made a 2ohm load from a pure sq perspective i could'nt understand why they did it. my main man well my phoenix gold dealer had some ran off a zx350 but at the time i did'nt get to hear them because he was still doing his install. to him it was all the hipe but it does go against the sq purest that resides within me so they were not for me to each his own i guess.
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14785
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

infinity makes 2 ohm comps but their tweeter makes my ears bleed.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
User avatar
12voltjunky
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by 12voltjunky »

guys, thanks for the input and i understand where you are coming from. i should have qualified my question with the fact that i will be using mid level components - at best. im on the lookout for something inexpensive but decent, so it might take a while. im upgrading factory speakers in a "new-to-me" set of wheels. with that being said, a true sq system is already out the window. :hmm: so what would i gain, if anything, by using 2 ohm comps? (other than wattage)

im curious about damping factor and the benefits of headroom or disadvantages of heat, etc...

thanks 8)
1- Zx 400 Ti
1- Ti 600.2
1- Ti 500.4 (resurrected by valeks1)
2- Ti 500.4
2- Ti 1000.2
2-Ti RMD, Lpl, PG 1/0 Ga
Ti 6.5 comps, Ti 5x7 coaxials
User avatar
The Golden One
Quarantined
Quarantined
Posts: 717
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 3:58 pm
Location: Tinkle Town T,N

Post by The Golden One »

you may gain a few db's but most likely will gain more distortion at higher level's so what ever db's you gain will be with some added distortion. probably when it starts to come on strong is when the distortion starts doing it's thing but if you could A/B a 4ohm setup to a 2ohm you would know for sure.
User avatar
12voltjunky
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by 12voltjunky »

^good point.

thanks again for the input. gonna stay on the hunt for something 4 ohm.

any soft domed reccommendations for the budget minded install? For what i paid, i really like my alpine sps coaxials but they are being used.
1- Zx 400 Ti
1- Ti 600.2
1- Ti 500.4 (resurrected by valeks1)
2- Ti 500.4
2- Ti 1000.2
2-Ti RMD, Lpl, PG 1/0 Ga
Ti 6.5 comps, Ti 5x7 coaxials
Audiophiliac
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Boise, ID

Post by Audiophiliac »

I ran some Image Dynamics CXS62 comps that were 2 ohm. I only sold them because in the v.1 mids, there was a gap around the phase plug that dirt could get in and make scratching noises. I got sick of trying to clean that gap out all the time. If not for that, I would probably not have ever switched.

BUT...I am glad I did because I swapped in a set of Exile Xtec65 comps and they sounded even better! :)
User avatar
waynehead
No, you're a towel.
Posts: 938
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Butthole of Ohio

Post by waynehead »

Yeah the only problem with ID's stuff is the very tight tolerances in the voice coil gap. Im not sure why they are this way, maybe it helps linearity at high excursion. I had problems with my idmax for the same reason. I still think they would do good for you.
We don't need no stinkin' bass boost!
Audiophiliac
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Boise, ID

Post by Audiophiliac »

I hear the v.2 ID CXS drivers have eliminated this as an issue.
User avatar
NewOldStock
Posts: 678
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:07 am
Location: SW Washington

Post by NewOldStock »

Isnt there another negative that comes along with dropping the impedance of a speaker?

I remember being told (but not who told me) and I remember reading somewhere (Home Theater forum) ... with that kind of qualifying statement, I should just stop talking now ... that as you drop impedance on a speaker, you actually decrease your amplifiers ability to control that speaker (damping factor?)... so an 8-ohm speaker would have a faster transition from note to note than a 2-ohm speaker. which is why home theater runs much higher impedance's than car audio... (8 - 16 ohm vs 2 - 4 ohm)

I wish I could remember where I read that, when I get home I will have to see if I can find it again... hell, maybe I just dreamed it because it sounds plausible but not right.
MX2 Crossover
Sapphire 1.5x - Sold
Roadster66 #11 - Sold
(2) RSdC 102 10" Subwoofers - Sold
User avatar
12voltjunky
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by 12voltjunky »

^ that sounds reasonable. to put it in leymans terms, i think of it like this: if you drop the impedance, you get more power from the amp basically trading quality for quantity.
1- Zx 400 Ti
1- Ti 600.2
1- Ti 500.4 (resurrected by valeks1)
2- Ti 500.4
2- Ti 1000.2
2-Ti RMD, Lpl, PG 1/0 Ga
Ti 6.5 comps, Ti 5x7 coaxials
Post Reply