Page 1 of 1

Why so few large mono blocks in other lines?

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 9:02 am
by Mackenzie
Im now looking at some other mono block alternatives so that I can be all pg. I have the sd 500.4 now, but the power I need is the elite 1. Why did pg decide to make all the high power mono blocks available on the elite/ ti versions? At 3200 watts for the sub stage, one doesnt need all these extra features, as most would assume the amp will be used for mostly spl/ insane daily driver applications.. Why not an sd 3200d? One would imagine it would sell better than the elite, especially to the insane crowd like myself.

I just think since they already make a very high end mono block that makes a ton of power, why not have still a decent mono that makes alot of power, but doesnt have gold plated circuit boards, and ect.. price point 1kish or less preferably.

Thoughts, comments, who agree's?

Re: Why so few large mono blocks in other lines?

Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:23 pm
by stipud
I think you're missing the point of the SD series...

Re: Why so few large mono blocks in other lines?

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:04 am
by Mackenzie
I just dont see the market in a nearly $2k 3500 watt mono block. Maybe im just the only.. Just doesnt make any sense to me. Just trying to make sense of it actually..

Re: Why so few large mono blocks in other lines?

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:06 am
by caraudiotech
There's always the option of running multiple SD1300.1's if you need more power but a tiny footprint. put 1 per DVC driver. I can tell you we do not have current plans for anything larger in the SD line.

And for Ti, the amps are strapable for more power.