Page 1 of 2

M50 Power?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:02 am
by bruther
Does anyone know what the actual power is for the M50 for 14.4Volts?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:26 am
by fuzzysnuggleduck
On a quick side note... did M series amps come with birthsheets listing "true" power on them like other PG lines have had?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:46 am
by Rold Gold
I got the sheet with my 2 M50's. I can check when I get home.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:50 am
by bruther
What would be normal volts coming from the battery? 14 14.4?? I want to know if my M50 will be enough power to run my new front components. I need at least 100wrms for each channel.

Let me know what you find out Fuzz.
Thanks
Brian

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:53 am
by fuzzysnuggleduck
bruther wrote:What would be normal volts coming from the battery? 14 14.4?? I want to know if my M50 will be enough power to run my new front components. I need at least 100wrms for each channel.

Let me know what you find out Fuzz.
Thanks
Brian
The difference between 100W and 85W is going to be fairly small in terms of output, although I'll concede that softer things like "control" and "tightness" can be perceived to be rather different between what seems like insignificant power differences.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:57 am
by bruther
I'm running a set of speakers the can handle 120wrms (180 max power) and I want to ensure I'm giving them proper amount of power. I do not want them to be underpowered.

Thoughts?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:20 pm
by Jim Truett
bruther wrote:

Thoughts?
IMO if the components are 4ohms, the M50 is most likely not enough amp. That does depend somewhat on the power going to the subs though.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:30 pm
by Rold Gold
What components are you using?????

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:46 pm
by fuzzysnuggleduck
While the acoustic environment will yield different results, doubling of power can somewhat be equated to 3db of gain, which while certainly not insignificant, isn't really THAT much.

I'm not going to question your desire for powering your speakers with their rated power, that's fine. I like more power as well. So, ignore my reservations about how much difference there will really be and hopefully someone will answer your initial question with a degree of accuracy ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:19 pm
by bruther
Does anyone have a thought on a PG amp (only 2 channel) that provides the power I'm looking for?? If not I was thinking of going with a Zapco amp..

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:20 pm
by bruther
I need an amp that has very clean power. I do not want a Class D.

amp

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:21 pm
by kg1961
m100,zx500,ms2125 to name a couple

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:30 pm
by bruther
Good call. 600.2ti I'm thinking.

I'm running an Outlaw in the setup but I need something for the main components.

Choices so hard.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:32 pm
by trl2112
ZX600Ti \Ti600.2 = 150 watts @ 4 ohms or a ZX475Ti\Ti500.4 bridge = 250 watts @ 4 ohms These will give you the power your lookin' for.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:51 pm
by Bfowler
xenon series bro. the most advanced amps PG has made to date. the 200.2 is wonderful, and can be found CHEAP

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:29 pm
by AVICJR
Bfowler wrote:xenon series bro. the most advanced amps PG has made to date. the 200.2 is wonderful, and can be found CHEAP
X2! I've been very impressed so far. X-over is great as well. Or you could get 2 M50's, 1 bridged to each side.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:16 pm
by oldskoolmseriesfan
Ive said it before , Ill say it again, back in the day I was running JBL 6.5 inch comps(GT series,back then they were BEEFY!)with the 1inch tweets in door pods.Those were x-over with the PG MX2, and 2 12inch Kicker XPL's with passive x-over. All off of one PG M50.
137.7 DB's and super clean. I think the M50 has plenty of oldskool power for the relatively small footprint it had. I could yap allday about that amp... nuff said.
PS the subs were wired in parrellell, it would get warm but didnt ever have to use a fan on it. For door speakers u will not be dissapointed running them off the M50.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:32 pm
by deathcloud
Someone should look up that birth sheet about the m50 at 14.4 id be interested in what it really puts out. But I had a x200.4 which puts out 200 rms into 4 channels and it was BOMB! for a week lol, but i didn't even have a Line driver either and my deck sucks for voltage. When I get it repaired and have my line driver hooked up with my new deck, im going to be in heaven. ALL the power I could want, great crossover, easy to use, and a power hungry beast!!! I so cant wait. I 2nd getting a x200.2 and they are relatively inexpensive for what you get. I don't know if ill ever switch amps. So satisfied!

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:55 am
by bruther
Someone has to know what an M50 pushes out at 14.4v?

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:50 am
by Rold Gold
http://ampguts.realmofexcursion.com/Phoenix_Gold_M50/

This is what ampguts has to say.......

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:02 am
by marko
85 a channel is just about on the nose tbh, plenty for most comps :)

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:04 am
by deathcloud
*cough* XENON *cough*

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:08 am
by Rold Gold
Sell me yer M50 if yer not gonna use it.......... :D

item

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:27 am
by kg1961
think he said it a outlaw the m50 side

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:24 pm
by bruther
I am using an outlaw but I need to get a component amp. I'm deciding between a Zapco 350.2 and a 600.2ti(if I can find one to my liking).