
Too good to not share
- mr tibbs
- Forum Goatee
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:03 pm
- Location: The land of morons, I mean mormons.:(
Too good to not share
Guys, I just found this tutorial on tweeter mounting that I felt was too good to not share it. It's on another forum but I really think we can all use this. Check it out here. And Tom, sorry for linking to another forum but I thought this was pure brilliance!! This is how I will mount the Ultra tweets in the FJ rather then trying to do fiberglass. Also, now I can try out some large format tweets in the car without worrying about how to mount them! 

[url=http://www.usbr.gov//][img]http://www.usbr.gov/images/banner-3.jpg[/img][/url]






Just grab the pix because they say it all......... Thats a sweet ideeeeeerrrrrr right there I must say....... I'll be doing that myself at some point..... I can gaaarrrroooonnnnttttteeeeee it.......

Those tender little burgers with them little, itty-bitty grilled onions that just explode in ya mouth like flavor crystals every time you bite into one.. just makes me want to burn this muthafuka down.... Come on, Pookie, let's burn this muthafuka down!!!
Re: Too good to not share
mr tibbs wrote:And Tom, sorry for linking to another forum


I've thought about using ricer gauge pods to do this, but finding the right size, and getting one that matches the passenger side is impossible. This is a much better idea.
- Thunderdome
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:19 pm
- Location: Ont.
Actually, that style of mounting and angling has become the newest trend in competition. More so in Europe then here. This is a very similar set-up we did in an EVO. With the object being, to get the main focus away from any of the reflective surfaces as best as posible. The 'pods' were machined from billet aluminum. Originally they were polished but later painted. But I can definitely see a cost difference there!


Greg Kitching
Depends on the tweet. A home audio tweet is typically better on-axis, while a car audio tweet would be better fired horizontally (45* off axis). Of course the best way to determine this is by doing lots of tests before you mount it permanently.mr tibbs wrote:Also, if I were to use this method where should I aim the tweets??
- mr tibbs
- Forum Goatee
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:03 pm
- Location: The land of morons, I mean mormons.:(
Well lucky for me I just found a way that I can do that easily!stipud wrote:Depends on the tweet. A home audio tweet is typically better on-axis, while a car audio tweet would be better fired horizontally (45* off axis). Of course the best way to determine this is by doing lots of tests before you mount it permanently.mr tibbs wrote:Also, if I were to use this method where should I aim the tweets??
I have heard so many different ways over the years I just can't remember. I never really had this kind of freedom to play with it before so I couldn't remember.


[url=http://www.usbr.gov//][img]http://www.usbr.gov/images/banner-3.jpg[/img][/url]
I understand the advantage for the tweeter in those pods but isn't the volumn lacking for the mids? Just seems like they'd be really hard pressed to perform in such a small enclosure?
95' M3
Alpine iDA-X305
iPod Classic (120GB ~10k songs)
PG TBAt2 line Driver
PG ZPX2 Active Crossover (x2 1ea.)
PG ZPA0.5 v2 (x2 Black)
Diamond Hex 6.5 (eton), silk tweeters (rear fill 5.25's @-8db)
Soundstream SS-10's (2) in a sealed box
Alpine iDA-X305
iPod Classic (120GB ~10k songs)
PG TBAt2 line Driver
PG ZPX2 Active Crossover (x2 1ea.)
PG ZPA0.5 v2 (x2 Black)
Diamond Hex 6.5 (eton), silk tweeters (rear fill 5.25's @-8db)
Soundstream SS-10's (2) in a sealed box
Thanks for the answer. What kind of frequency response comes from a dome mid? I assume they're like a big tweeter and the bottom end is rather limited? They're damn sexy looking at any rate... is it wrong that I want to poke the thing?
95' M3
Alpine iDA-X305
iPod Classic (120GB ~10k songs)
PG TBAt2 line Driver
PG ZPX2 Active Crossover (x2 1ea.)
PG ZPA0.5 v2 (x2 Black)
Diamond Hex 6.5 (eton), silk tweeters (rear fill 5.25's @-8db)
Soundstream SS-10's (2) in a sealed box
Alpine iDA-X305
iPod Classic (120GB ~10k songs)
PG TBAt2 line Driver
PG ZPX2 Active Crossover (x2 1ea.)
PG ZPA0.5 v2 (x2 Black)
Diamond Hex 6.5 (eton), silk tweeters (rear fill 5.25's @-8db)
Soundstream SS-10's (2) in a sealed box
- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
I didn't want to down it....but the only way I could use that is if I cut holes in my dash to put the mids in...you are supposed to keep the tweeters mounted as close to the mids as possible
I think angled kick panels or even angled door pods would blow that away as far as SQ goes
The tweeters are the last thing I want pointing directly at me
But everyone has their own sound, and style
So, what ever floats your boat
and tickles your pickle
That's the way to go
It really only matters to 1 person
You
I think angled kick panels or even angled door pods would blow that away as far as SQ goes
The tweeters are the last thing I want pointing directly at me
But everyone has their own sound, and style
So, what ever floats your boat
and tickles your pickle
That's the way to go
It really only matters to 1 person
You

- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- mr tibbs
- Forum Goatee
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:03 pm
- Location: The land of morons, I mean mormons.:(
That's what running active instead of passive and TA is for!dBincognito wrote:I didn't want to down it....but the only way I could use that is if I cut holes in my dash to put the mids in...you are supposed to keep the tweeters mounted as close to the mids as possible
I think angled kick panels or even angled door pods would blow that away as far as SQ goes
The tweeters are the last thing I want pointing directly at me
But everyone has their own sound, and style
So, what ever floats your boat
and tickles your pickle
That's the way to go
It really only matters to 1 person
You

Actually I'm not sure how they will look int he FJ, but I don't care. For me this beats the hell out of trying to take the A pillar off and trying to fiberglass, mainly because I have never done fiberglass before.


[url=http://www.usbr.gov//][img]http://www.usbr.gov/images/banner-3.jpg[/img][/url]
- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- mr tibbs
- Forum Goatee
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:03 pm
- Location: The land of morons, I mean mormons.:(
Not really, there are speakers in the back, but they are in the wayyyyy back. The vehicle is a Toyota FJ Cruiser. The set up will be Wakeup's Kenwood HU using the Ultra comps in the front running passive and an Exile shallow mount sub in the rear all running off of a PG Onyx (Xenon) 200.4. I think it will sound pretty good!dBincognito wrote:Do you plan on having a rear fill ?
What is the set-up in mind

[url=http://www.usbr.gov//][img]http://www.usbr.gov/images/banner-3.jpg[/img][/url]
- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- dBincognito
- Randy Bo-Bandy
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- mr tibbs
- Forum Goatee
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:03 pm
- Location: The land of morons, I mean mormons.:(
Yep, and that aint a gonna happen. I originally put this system together for the wife because she was driving the FJ all the time. Now we share and I usually drive the FJ so I want something a little better, but I'm not going to go overboard with this install. It's just going to have to do, but something tells me the Kenwood deck is going to help out greatly!!dBincognito wrote:Oh wait....then you need another amp![]()

[url=http://www.usbr.gov//][img]http://www.usbr.gov/images/banner-3.jpg[/img][/url]