" egg crate " foam or polyfils for sub ??

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

" egg crate " foam or polyfils for sub ??

Post by eyesofra »

hi guys,
i need some help with the choice of dampening material in my sub enclosure.

I was all set to stuff some polyfils into my new enclosure when i come across this ( figure 1 ) egg crate type foam in the Hi-Fi store that i bought the sub speaker cable from.

The guy there suggested this foam works a little better than polyfils in breaking down standing waves and all.

I know a lot of ppl use this type of dampening material but are they really better than polyfils ? Or is it that each is suited for different need ??

The sub box is a sealed 1.3cuft.

Pls advice frens.
Any input is much appreciated.
Thanks
Attachments
Figure 2 : close-up
Figure 2 : close-up
200320071804 (Small).jpg (37.76 KiB) Viewed 10982 times
Figure 1 : Egg crate foam
Figure 1 : Egg crate foam
200320071806 (Small).jpg (36.66 KiB) Viewed 10982 times
Francious70
Half Baked
Posts: 3533
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: TN, YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAW!!!!
Contact:

Post by Francious70 »

Never lined the inside of my enclosures. I'm not to sure what it'll do for you wither.
Boomshackalacka
User avatar
vin78
Vin Diesel
Posts: 1373
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: lalaland

Post by vin78 »

I think they are supposed to eliminate standing waves, I may be wrong though.

I usually use poly-fill b/c its cheaper.
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

The foam will eliminate standing waves which is good however the poly-fil will do that and also move around slightly which makes the enclosure size seem a bit larger to the speaker allowing a smoother response.

Both materials serve a slightly different function.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

thanks guys and thanks errin ,
think i'll just go with the polyfils ....

how much would be enough ?

These polyfils that i have are like 1 inch thick uncompressed , should I go with 1 layer on all the walls .

Are these(polyfils) the same material that my brother uses in his aquarium as filter material....gosh it looks and feels exactly the same with some that i pulled out of my old speakers.

The only difference i can see is this aquarium filter material looks a a little less dense than the "real thing.

Errin i hope you can help me out a little here....thanks
The subs goin to house the 12"RSD in a 1.25cuft sealed.

Thanks guys...u ppl the greatest...
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

2 bags like this should be more than enough.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Poly-Fil-BIG-BAG-Fi ... dZViewItem
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
User avatar
bdubs767
Hukd on Foniks
Posts: 2743
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:47 am
Location: Mass

Post by bdubs767 »

go to walmart its cheaper too
Can one send others to war if hes not willing to go himself?
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

two bags of those ?
it has to be more than enough....:)
ok i'll try that out.
Thanks a lot guys
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

Yes 2 bags would likely be a bit overkill but stuff it so it is not hard packed but loosely-full. Most likely you will have some left over.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

thanks errin,

lastly can you pls explain on how exacly should i fill up the enclosure.

I've got two types of polyfils with me now, one is poly wool type (fig1 )and the other one comes in a a little firm rectangular shaped form (fig 2)).

1) Should i use the fig.2 type and just line and attach it to the sidewalls and floor in the enclosure ??
If its better to use the wool type , how should i go bout it ??
Do i need to use glue to paste it within the enclosure or just stuff it to the rear wall and floor ??

2)Is there any specific weight guideline I've got to follow or how many grams must i use for my enclosure ( an approximate ).

Pls suggest , ur help is much needed and appreciated.
Friends pls suggest too.

Thanks
Attachments
Fig 2 : mat type
Fig 2 : mat type
210320071816 (Medium).jpg (39.75 KiB) Viewed 10897 times
Fig 1 : wool type
Fig 1 : wool type
210320071815 (Medium).jpg (58.52 KiB) Viewed 10897 times
Wink
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:29 pm

Post by Wink »

dont you have to worry about that stuff getting into ur coils....thats just what ive heard.... :roll:
Boxing Is My Life So Dont Try To Take My Life [img]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f312/1Winky/Boxing_match.gif[/img]
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

Just loosely fill the enclosure with either, you'll be fine. The flat version is great in a ported enclosure because you can line the walls and it has a cleaner look when viewed through a port hole, however the effect of the two is the same.


You should not worry about it getting into the coil as most drivers have a grill of some form in the pole piece vent, however it would take intent to get it into the speaker assembly in most cases and is not going to get in the works accidentally that I have ever seen.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
Wink
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:29 pm

Post by Wink »

aaahhh ic
Boxing Is My Life So Dont Try To Take My Life [img]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f312/1Winky/Boxing_match.gif[/img]
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

thanks again errin ,
just wandering , if we loosely fill in with those wools ,
dont we have to worry of them flying around within the enclosure when the sub is working?

Or does it creates some sort of vacuum when completely sealed??

Just brushing up some physics...hope u wont mind answering this.. :wink:

thanks a lot for all the guide.
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

It'll move around but nothing to worry about.


If a vacuum was formed then the speaker would be sucked inward. You only get a sealed airspace no vacuum. If a vacuum were to be formed there would be no back wave from the sub as sound doesn't really convey through a true vacuum so the need for poly-fil would then be negligible, and the fact of no sound moving off the back of the sub means the energy being created would not be leaving the source and the driver would quickly fail due to heat build up...............wow where did that come from, it's way to early to be thinking like that.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

that is truly a " wow " errin :shock:
man, what did u major in , acoustical engineering ??

yes of course, it cant be a vacuum now can it...like you said it'll be sucked inwards by the difference of air pressure
........mind me with that question :lol:

errin, one last question, are there any difference between normal rectangular enclosure and the sloped( triangle) type?
In terms of resonance, sound quality, standing waves ??

Also i came across a complete enclosure building guide for the RSD12 but into a 0.8cuft enclosure. I think i got it from the PG ftp.

I've attached it down here and I was just curious if there any other guide available for fitting the RSD into a 1.2 cuft ??

Regards,
Amuthan
Attachments
RSd SINGLE 12 SEALED.pdf
RSD 12" SEALED ENCLOSURE MANUAL - 0.8 cuft
(82.33 KiB) Downloaded 548 times
User avatar
dedlyjedly
Silent but Dedly
Posts: 1212
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Post by dedlyjedly »

Not that it has any bearing on the polyfill question, but a sealed enclosure does act like a vacuum 50% of the time if the enclosure is completely sealed after the sub is mounted. A vacuum has to occur when the sub is exerting itself outward. Then as the sub moves back to its resting position pressure becomes equal on both sides of the cone.
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

You can take that diagram and make the side to side length a bit more and be golden. The angled side help to reduce standing waves.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
User avatar
dragonplayboy
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:23 am

Post by dragonplayboy »

would it make sense to polyfill the .6 cube enclosure I'm building for my RSD10? if so will do. also, I only have about half an inch to an inch clearance behind the woofer, should I try to squeeze some behind it anyway?
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

Poly-fil will help to flatten/smooth the response so go for it, you may like it better that way, you may not. I however would not say to squeeze it behind the motor if you have such minimal clearance.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
User avatar
dragonplayboy
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:23 am

Post by dragonplayboy »

would it be wise to go to a half cube and then polyfill it? Errin, as I recall, you reccommended .6 cubes = perfect for musicality (not going for loud AT ALL) on the rsd10, would polyfilling change that or just smooth it out at the same (enclosure) volume?

thx!
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

It'll smooth it out.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

if the polyfils make the enclosure appear larger to the sub , wouldn't that affect the volume , thus the Qtc of the enclosure :?:

My enclosure of around 1.2 cuft gives a Qtc of 1.07.
So Errin, does this get changed after i stuff in whatever amount of polyfils ?


A little confused here :?: Do explain pls
VW337
Meatgician
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:53 am
Location: PORK-Land OR

Post by VW337 »

Poly-fil allows for a 10% variation in enclosure size (+/- 5%) but ultimately it allows a flat response without internal reflections. The variation of the "seen" volume will change a bit under typical driver movement so at certain notes the enclosure may act smaller and others may cause it to act larger, again this variant allows the driver to act more linear in a typical enclosure and this linear fashion tends to smooth out peaks and roll off a little less steeply.
I think we've established that "Ka Ka" and "Tukki Tukki" don't work.
eyesofra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: from Cameron Highlands MY to ACT AU
Contact:

Post by eyesofra »

errin , is this enough or should i add more polyfils....still got a bag full of them....:)

(and thats a 1.22cuft box for the ultimate rsd 12")
Attachments
polyflls_filled_1.2cuft (1).JPG
polyflls_filled_1.2cuft (1).JPG (22.65 KiB) Viewed 10743 times
polyflls_filled_1.2cuft.JPG
polyflls_filled_1.2cuft.JPG (22.44 KiB) Viewed 10744 times
" If u know the rules, then u can break them " - Vidal S
Post Reply