Phoenix Gold Ti 1000.2??

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
MEGA
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:18 am

Phoenix Gold Ti 1000.2??

Post by MEGA »

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Phoenix-Gold-Tita ... 240%3A1318

Hi all;

I've never heard of the above! I have 2x Ti 500.4, and an 800.1

I've never seen a 1000.2 before. Whats the point of it exactly?

Best regards :)
User avatar
fordtough1
Twisted's Boyfriend
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: Are we there yet?

Post by fordtough1 »

It's a big damn 2 channel amp. I used mine for subs when I had it.

Specs here....

http://download.phoenixphorum.com/Manua ... Manual.pdf
MEGA
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:18 am

Post by MEGA »

I saw that doc already, cheers though :)

Just wonder why you'd bother with a 1000.2 rather than a 1200.1 and wire parallel for 2 subs
User avatar
bretti_kivi
Shutterbug
Posts: 1595
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: Päijät-Häme or Uusimaa

Post by bretti_kivi »

midbass? :lol:
MEGA
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:18 am

Post by MEGA »

1000 watts of midbass? :D

Thats hardcore :D
User avatar
joyride
Posts: 709
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:16 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Post by joyride »

I ran mine as a sub amp. I didnt really need the 1200.1, as mine was benched at 1200 watts anyway. I mainly got it because the price was right (paid around $550 total from car domain when they stopped carrying them.) Also, that would be a perfect amp for some ti elite components.
User avatar
fuzzysnuggleduck
Soy Milquetoast
Posts: 4423
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: The best place on earth
Contact:

Post by fuzzysnuggleduck »

MEGA wrote:I saw that doc already, cheers though :)

Just wonder why you'd bother with a 1000.2 rather than a 1200.1 and wire parallel for 2 subs
Class A/B vs Class D.
SOLD: '91 PG 4Runner
User avatar
AVICJR
Team Coach
Posts: 2854
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Texas

Post by AVICJR »

fuzzysnuggleduck wrote:
MEGA wrote:I saw that doc already, cheers though :)

Just wonder why you'd bother with a 1000.2 rather than a 1200.1 and wire parallel for 2 subs
Class A/B vs Class D.
The Ti1200.1 is a true AB amp.
User avatar
joyride
Posts: 709
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:16 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Post by joyride »

yup, they both pull ridiculous amount of current (mine benched at 155 amps)
User avatar
dedlyjedly
Silent but Dedly
Posts: 1212
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Post by dedlyjedly »

I'm going to be running my Ti500.4's bridged-stereo in order to get the type of stereo power you can get out of the 1000.2. If I wasn't going to be using some of the crossover features on the 4 channels I'd upgrade to the big stereo amp in a heartbeat. If they were also aluminum that is. :wink:
User avatar
fuzzysnuggleduck
Soy Milquetoast
Posts: 4423
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: The best place on earth
Contact:

Post by fuzzysnuggleduck »

AVICJR wrote:
fuzzysnuggleduck wrote:
MEGA wrote:I saw that doc already, cheers though :)

Just wonder why you'd bother with a 1000.2 rather than a 1200.1 and wire parallel for 2 subs
Class A/B vs Class D.
The Ti1200.1 is a true AB amp.
:shock:

Damn. I should read.
SOLD: '91 PG 4Runner
MEGA
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:18 am

Post by MEGA »

Cheers for the info.

Sorely tempted but I know I don't need it :D

is 3 Ti amps enough for one mans boot? :)
phoenixgold79
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:55 am

Post by phoenixgold79 »

i use my TI1000.2 on the 8 16.5cm woofers (at 1 ohm) and it works really good
User avatar
dBincognito
Randy Bo-Bandy
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm

Post by dBincognito »

phoenixgold79 wrote:i use my TI1000.2 on the 8 16.5cm woofers (at 1 ohm) and it works really good
Welcome to the Phorum!!!!!!!!!!

what kind of woofers do you use?
User avatar
Bfowler
Briaans..... BRIAAAAANNNNNNS
Posts: 10769
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:06 am
Location: So easy, a cavewomen could do him

Post by Bfowler »

fuzzysnuggleduck wrote:
MEGA wrote:I saw that doc already, cheers though :)

Just wonder why you'd bother with a 1000.2 rather than a 1200.1 and wire parallel for 2 subs
Class A/B vs Class D.
pg didnt make a class d until the octane series. the 1200.1 is still a a/b amp

the 1000.2 is really meant to be a monster 2 channel amp, and shouldn't be run lower then 4ohms bridged. wheras the 1200.1 can be run safely down to 1ohm
my ex-girlfriend said "its car audio or me"
i've had tougher choices at a soda machine...
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Post by stipud »

phoenixgold79 wrote:i use my TI1000.2 on the 8 16.5cm woofers (at 1 ohm) and it works really good
1 ohm bridged or stereo?

1 ohm bridged = 0.5 ohm stereo, which is way too low for that amp. It's optimized for 2 ohms, stable at 1 ohm, but 0.5 is way too low, and could easily cause damage.
nutxo
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:25 pm

Post by nutxo »

Bfowler wrote:
Class A/B vs Class D.
pg didnt make a class d until the octane series. the 1200.1 is still a a/b amp
Didnt xenon come before octane?
User avatar
AVICJR
Team Coach
Posts: 2854
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Texas

Post by AVICJR »

nutxo wrote:
Bfowler wrote:
Class A/B vs Class D.
pg didnt make a class d until the octane series. the 1200.1 is still a a/b amp
Didnt xenon come before octane?
No. Octane came out about around the time as the Titanium line. Or at least they were in production near the same time line as their high end/low(er) end lines. Xenon replaced the Titanium line.
nutxo
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:25 pm

Post by nutxo »

AVICJR wrote:
nutxo wrote:
Bfowler wrote:
Class A/B vs Class D.
pg didnt make a class d until the octane series. the 1200.1 is still a a/b amp
Didnt xenon come before octane?
No. Octane came out about around the time as the Titanium line. Or at least they were in production near the same time line as their high end/low(er) end lines. Xenon replaced the Titanium line.
Thats fucking crazy. How could they go from some of the best amps made to the octane series? I thought it was more gradual.
User avatar
AVICJR
Team Coach
Posts: 2854
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Texas

Post by AVICJR »

Octane's weren't bad at all. I have rarely if EVER heard of a flaw or complaint or problem from an Octane amp on this forum or the "two predecessors". And to top it off, it's an entry level amp. It's no M or MS line, but that's what the Ti line was for. :wink:
nutxo
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:25 pm

Post by nutxo »

AVICJR wrote:Octane's weren't bad at all. I have rarely if EVER heard of a flaw or complaint or problem from an Octane amp on this forum or the "two predecessors". And to top it off, it's an entry level amp. It's no M or MS line, but that's what the Ti line was for. :wink:
Meh.

Anyways Im looking for that thread that discusses sq of each line. Aby chance you remember what thread Im looking for?
User avatar
AVICJR
Team Coach
Posts: 2854
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Texas

Post by AVICJR »

nutxo
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:25 pm

Post by nutxo »

Nope. There was a thread just before cecil left.
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14797
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

the octane series came out just after the limited edition octane amp came out which was the ZXti series amps. They were still solid amps made from the remains of the ti series which were solid.
nutxo
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:25 pm

Post by nutxo »

ttocs wrote:the octane series came out just after the limited edition octane amp came out which was the ZXti series amps. They were still solid amps made from the remains of the ti series which were solid.
So those white, blinged out swap meet looking amps are close to the ti line?
Post Reply