

So I guess what Im saying is PROPS to both brands from that era, and I still would love to get my hands on a Rodek now, as they were WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more expensive than both of the other 2 brands.
They also had the power and SQ aswell.
Haha!! our populationg was around 2,000oldskoolmseriesfan wrote:Ive lived in the same small town all my life, I think our POP at the moment is maybe 120,000, in 1990-98 when I got into this addiction, obviously it was much smaller. We had 2.5 stores to go to, one was PG, the other was RF, and the other .5 was Rodek, the town was split 48%PG,48%RF and the other 4 was Rodek, all you seen at the comps was the latter 2. The PG fanboys (including myself) were more SQL oriented and the RF boys were SPL freaks, and it was a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE rivalry, Ill say this though, I was never able to listen to an RF SQ install, because evry RF setup in town was a wall of subs and nothing else
But I remember those RF amps to have GOBS of power, where as the PG's were close in power aswell but sounded better. I feel bad for all the Rodek guys because they had the SQ set ups but they had nowhere to go to compete unless they drove to Vancouver, or even as far away as Kelowna, at that time it took a good 6 hrs one way to get there. So we (PG and RF) kind of pushed Rodek outta Dodge.
So I guess what Im saying is PROPS to both brands from that era, and I still would love to get my hands on a Rodek now, as they were WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more expensive than both of the other 2 brands.
They also had the power and SQ aswell.
SHUCKS!!oldskoolmseriesfan wrote:Your newest personal system sounds the the makeings of the worst system ever
I think I might have a couple here.. I'll check for yaEric D wrote:I would still like to get my hands on maybe 4 Punch 100ix amps and use that in an install. I would have them recoated to a different color to match what ever car I put them into.
oh i thnk its th 250m amps (the dark greyones that look like th 200ix) coem to think of it (ill have to find pics) it may have been the 500onesshawn k wrote:brenzbmr@sb wrote:woot
anyway i would agree with eric over the 200ix then the 250m2
rockford used to have this perfect system two 250m2s strapped to two power 15s 8ohms for 1400 watts of bass in your face. well i built 3 of those systems for 3 differnt customers..they all failed. really had no output to match my 2 4 ohm power 15s on one ms2125 bridged(seriously)
all cars had alternators and big wiring. one customer was so fed up he offered to buy my amp and give me two of the 250s, so i did some thinking and this customer had 2 punch 200ix one running 4 sets of power componant mids per door.
so i swapped the amps to were the puch 200ix was running a 15 each and the doors got the 250s * big difference. so then i took the 8ohm drivers back and installed two 4ohm drivers and readjusted all the gains and BAM this thing kicked major ass. the boxes i made for the powers were about 3.5 cubic ft per tunded at 33hz. the customer was like WTF.
I never pushed that rockford system again( if i remembr it was the same set up they used in there impala) the one thing i did notice that was impressive is how much fuller the 200ix sounded then the 250. quote]
Are you sure you are not referring to the 500m or 250m (not 250m2)? The 250m2 is not strappable. Is there any chance you had that little bass boost up on the 200ix? That could explain the "fuller" sound out of the 200. Just a thought. The Power series were designed as more of a purist amp, (no bass or treble boost on these guys) and I would have done exactly the same as you with those specific amps..ie. 200ix for the subs and 250m2 for the full range drivers.
oldskoolmseriesfan wrote:^^^ Alpine 7949 + A/D/S + Audison VRX =![]()
![]()
![]()
A/D/S and AVI need alot more respect. Well I guess guys like us like to keep these guys quite so we dont drive the prices up