deflex vs acoustic foam ?

Post by **bdubs767** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:05 am

Logically in my mind, wouldn't acoustic foam be superior since it asorbes the back waves instead of dispersing like a deflex pad? I may be off be I think my logic is pretty good here.

dedlyjedly · Post by **dedlyjedly** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:56 am

i wouldn't go so far as to say the foam would be superior, but if used properly it should be just as effective. Had the president of HushMat in the shop the other day to give us a sales pitch and I posed this very question to him since hushmat doesn't sell a deflex/dynaxorb type product. btw, have you seen Hushmat's accoustical foam!? that stuff is fantastic.

Post by **bdubs767** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:09 pm

dedlyjedly wrote:i wouldn't go so far as to say the foam would be superior, but if used properly it should be just as effective. Had the president of HushMat in the shop the other day to give us a sales pitch and I posed this very question to him since hushmat doesn't sell a deflex/dynaxorb type product. btw, have you seen Hushmat's accoustical foam!? that stuff is fantastic.

linky?

Mackenzie · Post by **Mackenzie** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 2:51 pm

Waits for the link..

Audiophiliac · Post by **Audiophiliac** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:03 pm

http://www.hushmat.com/

Mackenzie · Post by **Mackenzie** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:43 pm

Audiophiliac wrote:

http://www.hushmat.com/

I see a small article about it, but still no pictures.

dedlyjedly · Post by **dedlyjedly** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:39 pm

I've got a sample i can take a picture of tomorrow.

Wink · Post by **Wink** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:13 am

click the mobile audio link u'll see the products there, looks a lot like dynmat.