System change to PG

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
Post Reply
User avatar
soundpepe
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am

System change to PG

Post by soundpepe »

hello there,
First sorry for my bad english, I'm from Germany.
I have a Rockford Fosgate Punch 45 25toLife anniversary edition as amp.
Now I read in the web that PG amps are better. As Im an electronic Freak, I know that the a Darlington amp sounds pretty good...
At eBay is a GD MAC200 for sale, but I dont know if its in Darlington configuration.
Can anybody post me which GD amps are in darlington configuration?
THX: Peter :shock:
User avatar
dBincognito
Randy Bo-Bandy
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm

Post by dBincognito »

Not sure on all of them....but I know the

M series
MS series
MPS series

are darlington....it's still early for me, I am not fully awake yet :oops: :lol:
Last edited by dBincognito on Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:14 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Thunderdome
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:19 pm
Location: Ont.

Post by Thunderdome »

if you check the pg manuals and information section and look for manuals just above this post most amp manuals are there and yes the 2240 is triple darlington hope that helps
-
-
-
Remember: The chart serves only as a starting point. Ultimately you must use your ears as a guide.
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14797
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by ttocs »

if I am not mistaken, the mac200 amp you are talking about is more rare then an authentic power 1000....
User avatar
soundpepe
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am

mac 200

Post by soundpepe »

not the 2240, the mac200, that i cant find in the manuals.
but i have heard now that the mac200 is identical to the ms275. It is the audiophil-version of it.
THX: Peter
User avatar
kg1961
Got wood?
Posts: 9051
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Calgary

item

Post by kg1961 »

most of my gear is gone :liar:
2020 honda accord sport
User avatar
soundpepe
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am

mac200

Post by soundpepe »

oh fine . thats it.
many thanks.
As Zappa said: Now I can go home. Home is where the heart is. On the bus.... :P
User avatar
Thunderdome
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:19 pm
Location: Ont.

Post by Thunderdome »

sorry my bad :D trying to do to many things at one time but it was in the manual section 8)
-
-
-
Remember: The chart serves only as a starting point. Ultimately you must use your ears as a guide.
scottn29
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:04 pm

Post by scottn29 »

User avatar
soundpepe
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am

fine forum

Post by soundpepe »

still annother time, many thanks to all for trying to help me.
Hope to get the mac200 on the bay.
Did anybody know how it sounds? My RF sounds powerful and refined.But for my opinion too refined. Any Ideas? :?
User avatar
stipud
Voltage Ohms
Posts: 14719
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 1983 4:00 am
Location: Burnaby, BC
Contact:

Re: fine forum

Post by stipud »

soundpepe wrote:still annother time, many thanks to all for trying to help me.
Hope to get the mac200 on the bay.
Did anybody know how it sounds? My RF sounds powerful and refined.But for my opinion too refined. Any Ideas? :?
It's easily one of PG's best sounding amplifiers. I am sure you will not be disappointed.

I have never been thrilled with Rockford amps for their sound quality. However they do undeniably make a lot of power.

Here's an interesting comparison between an RF amplifier and a PG M25 (little baby version of the MAC200)
http://www.soundbuggy.com/Eric/Car%20Au ... index.html
phoenix_rising
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:27 am

Post by phoenix_rising »

Why is it considered the Audiophile version of the Ms275?
Last edited by phoenix_rising on Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dBincognito
Randy Bo-Bandy
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm

Post by dBincognito »

phoenix_rising wrote:Why is it considered the Audiofile version of the Ms275?
It is optimized for 8/4 ohms and not 2/4 ohms :wink:
phoenix_rising
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:27 am

Post by phoenix_rising »

ah!! :)

I'd have thought there can only be a handful of 8ohm comp sets out there? I was under the impression that 8ohm and up loads were more common in home audio application?
User avatar
dBincognito
Randy Bo-Bandy
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm

Post by dBincognito »

phoenix_rising wrote:ah!! :)

I'd have thought there can only be a handful of 8ohm comp sets out there? I was under the impression that 8ohm and up loads were more common in home audio application?


I'm not looking for any kind of debate, I will just say I think 8 ohms sounds better than 4 and certainly better than 2.....and if you run 2 four ohm comp sets...you can run 8 ohms :wink:

Or just buy individual driver's and not comp sets, like me :D
Then you have far more choices and usually better speakers for less money :wink:
phoenix_rising
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:27 am

Post by phoenix_rising »

yea totally - i hear ya... nah it was more aimed at the fact that i was surprised PG bothered to make an amp aimed at 8ohm....
User avatar
dBincognito
Randy Bo-Bandy
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm

Post by dBincognito »

phoenix_rising wrote:yea totally - i hear ya... nah it was more aimed at the fact that i was surprised PG bothered to make an amp aimed at 8ohm....

I would rather have seen them make a MS4125, a real 4 channel with some serious power to be had :D
User avatar
Bfowler
Briaans..... BRIAAAAANNNNNNS
Posts: 10769
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:06 am
Location: So easy, a cavewomen could do him

Post by Bfowler »

for the record the pg amps that used triple darlington:

m
ms
mps
zpa
zx
ti
xenon
rsd
my ex-girlfriend said "its car audio or me"
i've had tougher choices at a soda machine...
Post Reply