I need a new 10 inch sub for a small box, what should work?

gentlejax2 · Post by **gentlejax2** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:51 am

I want to try something new..Needs to be able to go in a 1 cft box and run off a 700 watt US Amps tri-path digital amp...

I havnt used the amp yet so I dont know how well it works , I just know its overbuilt...

what would be good at a cost of around $100 or so? I dont need too much boom but I want it to be decent bass for rock mostly, no rapp stuff

Post by **AVICJR** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:01 pm

Exile 10" or 12" Xtec slim mount subs, are a little more than $100 but it (10") got a lot of good reviews. Also the XP 12" only requires 1.1 cu.ft. volume enclosure.

Linky

Post by **stipud** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:48 pm

RSD 10's are perfect in even 0.6 cubic feet, if you can afford the depth.

Post by **bdubs767** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:09 pm

peerless XLS 10" is better then all from design point of view and for a sealed enclosure of a Q w/ .707 only needs .18 cu ft

and w/ the PR only needs .7 cu ft

I have yet to hear so cant say....but RSd is a amazing sub woofer

RRsd 10 for a q of .707 needs 1.1 cu ft

http://www.madisound.com/cgi-bin/index. ... 77&pid=828

gentlejax2 · Post by **gentlejax2** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:47 am

who has the RSD's cause I never see them...I will look for one..

brenzbmr@sb · Post by **brenzbmr@sb** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:12 am

the peerlesss only needs .18 for a q of .707

will teh speaker even fit in the box

if you build it 10x10x3 it comes out about .17 gross

what is the depth of the sub?

Post by **bdubs767** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:23 am

brenzbmr@sb wrote:the peerlesss only needs .18 for a q of .707

will teh speaker even fit in the box

if you build it 10x10x3 it comes out about .17 gross

what is the depth of the sub?

lol I dont think it will to be honest, but you could get it to work w/ bracing placed properly.....I personally woudln't use it w/o PR tho rolls of at like 80hz, but with cabin gain you do almost get a near flat response. The XLS 12" I have only needs .42 cu ft for a Q of .707

.

Post by **Bfowler** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:22 pm

gentlejax2 wrote:who has the RSD's cause I never see them...I will look for one..

im running a pair of them....loving them!