DAMN! I thought I was the only one.dBincognito wrote:I have 3 PLD-1's instead
Yes, I'm a newbie here.

x2 - I couldnt agree more.KUB3 wrote:Personally I want an MS amp for 2010 - ideally white like the old look, with beautiful circuit board craftsmanship, built to last! I also want it compact as well, so it fit's easily in a boot. A bit like the old MS-275 in size, or perhaps a tad bigger is ok. Perhaps the Brax Matrix X4 is the best all round package out there right now. It's just too expensive. I reckon £700-1000 UK Sterling is about as much as I'd want to spend on a 2 channel amp. Maybe £1500 tops for a 4 channel amp.
Nice! Space is definitely at a premium in my ride and the 1200.1 fit the bill perfectly for 2 12" RSDc subs. Definitely looking forward to the rebirth of PG.MW3 wrote:If you like the T1200.1.
There will be three different amps to choose from in the 1000 to 1500 watt range with varying footprints, some big, some very small.
They will all be 1 ohm stable amplifiers.
Im sure that they would address the extra heat problems, by way of fans or other means, I believe Audison uses a convection cooling system?deathcloud wrote:Yea stable at 1ohm is sooooo sexy. Thats what I'm talking about. I just hope that going to 1ohm won't bring that much more heat. and problems.
NewOldStock wrote:x2 - I couldnt agree more.KUB3 wrote:Personally I want an MS amp for 2010 - ideally white like the old look, with beautiful circuit board craftsmanship, built to last! I also want it compact as well, so it fit's easily in a boot. A bit like the old MS-275 in size, or perhaps a tad bigger is ok. Perhaps the Brax Matrix X4 is the best all round package out there right now. It's just too expensive. I reckon £700-1000 UK Sterling is about as much as I'd want to spend on a 2 channel amp. Maybe £1500 tops for a 4 channel amp.
Something akin to the gold boards with good layouts that you can put plexi-on and run on display. Dont have to be gold - but that would be best IMO - there are lots of things/colors/etc... that would make the amp look great.
Let's not forget they did bring the MS amps back with the 10th anniversary series and they were a total sales flop. A modernized amp may do better, but clearly if MS was the answer those 10th anniversaries would have sold like hotcakes.KUB3 wrote:Personally I want an MS amp for 2010 - ideally white like the old look, with beautiful circuit board craftsmanship, built to last! I also want it compact as well, so it fit's easily in a boot. A bit like the old MS-275 in size, or perhaps a tad bigger is ok. Perhaps the Brax Matrix X4 is the best all round package out there right now. It's just too expensive. I reckon £700-1000 UK Sterling is about as much as I'd want to spend on a 2 channel amp. Maybe £1500 tops for a 4 channel amp.
oldschoolfan wrote:This may be a bit of a rant but bear with me.
Sure China's quality has come forward light years. We have given them the technology and the money to make it happen. Plus we have demanded it. It being higher quality and low prices. It is not just about quality and skyrocketing profits. What ever happened to being passionate about what you do? What about a conscience? How much is a reasonable profit margin? Why fund Communism?
The whole reason Phoenix gold and I will mention Rockford Fosgate and other low volume, at the time, electronics manufacturers, have the reputations that they do is because of the passion they had back in the 80's and 90's. They had engineers that were in love with car audio. They wanted to build the best sounding, best looking and coolest product they could possibly come up with. Yes they cost a lot but those products are what made them and gave them their reputations. The best way to be in control of all aspects of your product as in design, build quality, service and repair and customer service is to have it all in one place. I know from experience that people on any assembly line feel a lot more pride when they can actually communicate with the designers and feel a part of the total product. What better way to make necessary adjustments and tweaks to a product than having the assembly right around the corner from the design team. There are too many overall benefits to functioning this way.
Companies need to start looking long term and not how much can I sell this week. We have destroyed our economy by cutting our manufacturing base in this country by more than half. I challenge all of you to look at everything you buy over the next week, whatever it is, and look at the label to see where it is made. All of those products used to be made by your neighbor or their neighbor here in the states. We are a consumer based nation and we consume like no other. Why cannot we employ our own out of work people and make products that we can once again be proud of?
Phoenix Gold set out to make the best possible product that the engineers could think up. They did it and most of us here on this forum are still using and or collecting those products from 15 to 20 years ago. There is a reason for that.
Aamp, if you want to make the highest possible profit margin, you know what to do.
If you want to make products that we can all be proud of and passionate about from designer to engineer, from assembly line to retailer and finally to the consumer and maybe the guy that buys that product from that consumer 15 years from now, you also know what to do.
oldschoolfan wrote: We have destroyed our economy by cutting our manufacturing base in this country by more than half.
point of order....do you know what pg's books looked like during that era? pg never was known for being financially successfuloldschoolfan wrote:
Aamp, if you want to make the highest possible profit margin, you know what to do.
oldschoolfan wrote:Bruther, I should would like to know what all this increased manufacturing is that you speak of so I can start to buy that instead of all the other stuff out there. Is it clothing, textiles, electronics? Maybe auto parts? I know home furnishings. No, housewares, shoes maybe, or those cellphones you mentioned? No, sorry. I have to stop. I got us off topic and I apologize to all. My bust.
Does that include millitary contracts for "manufactured" goods as well?bruther wrote:oldschoolfan wrote:Bruther, I should would like to know what all this increased manufacturing is that you speak of so I can start to buy that instead of all the other stuff out there. Is it clothing, textiles, electronics? Maybe auto parts? I know home furnishings. No, housewares, shoes maybe, or those cellphones you mentioned? No, sorry. I have to stop. I got us off topic and I apologize to all. My bust.
In 2007 the US made 1.831 trillion dollars worth of "manufactured" goods.
It's gotta be something in that list of yours.
fuzzysnuggleduck wrote:Does that include millitary contracts for "manufactured" goods as well?bruther wrote:oldschoolfan wrote:Bruther, I should would like to know what all this increased manufacturing is that you speak of so I can start to buy that instead of all the other stuff out there. Is it clothing, textiles, electronics? Maybe auto parts? I know home furnishings. No, housewares, shoes maybe, or those cellphones you mentioned? No, sorry. I have to stop. I got us off topic and I apologize to all. My bust.
In 2007 the US made 1.831 trillion dollars worth of "manufactured" goods.
It's gotta be something in that list of yours.