ZX450 power ratings...

flogger11 · Post by **flogger11** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:55 pm

What is the deal w/ the 2 ohm stereo rating being 150 watts rms x 4 on the ZX-450, while the 4 ohm bridged rating is 250 watts x 2? This doesnt make sense to me as a 2 ohm stereo load is identical to a 4 ohm bridged. Which rating is correct? Anyone want to enlighten me on why pg would rate power like this?

Post by **Bfowler** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:29 pm

that is a really damn good point....and the answer is....no damn clue.

try pm'ing Roland on the form, we works for PG and has YEARS of experiance with all pg's amps

Post by **stipud** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:33 pm

PG really sucks at getting their facts checked in manuals

I'd bet that 300 is the correct number.

flogger11 · Post by **flogger11** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:05 pm

stipud wrote:PG really sucks at getting their facts checked in manuals

I'd bet that 300 is the correct number.

I tend to agree, thus I went w/ the 750 watt rms driver, vs the 400 watt one I currently was using. (Bridging the zx450, one to each voicecoil)

nutxo · Post by **nutxo** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:32 pm

Amps built when a lower power rating was more desirable for one thing maybe.

Post by **Bfowler** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:56 am

true, they might have been trying to sneak it into a lower copetition bracket